Reframing the Morbidity and Mortality Conference: The Impact of a Just Culture.

ABSTRACT: Morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences are prevalent in all fields of medicine. Historically, they arose out a desire to improve medical care. Nevertheless, the goals of M&M conferences are often poorly defined, at odds with one another, and do not support a just culture. We differentiate among the various possible goals of an M&M and review the literature for strategies that have been shown to achieve these goals. Based on the literature, we outline an ideal M&M structure within the context of just culture: The process starts with robust adverse event and near miss reporting, followed by careful case selection, excluding cases solely attributable to individual error. Prior to the M&M, the case should be openly discussed with involved members and should be reviewed using a selected framework. The goal of the M&M should be selected and clearly defined, and the presentation format and rules of conduct should all conform to the selected presentation goal. The audience should ideally be multidisciplinary and multispecialty. The M&M should conclude with concrete tasks and assigned follow-up. The entire process should be conducted in a peer review protected format within an environment promoting psychological safety. We conclude with future directions for M&Ms.

A Prospective Cohort Study on the Respiratory Effect on Modified Mallampati Scoring.

Background: Mallampati scoring is a common exam method for evaluating the oropharynx as a part of the airway assessment and for anticipation of difficult intubation. It partitions the oropharynx into 4 categories with scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4. Even though its reliability is known to be limited by confounding factors such as patient positioning, patient phonation, tongue protrusion, and examiner variability, the effect of respiration, i.e., inspiration and expiration, has not yet been formally studied. Methods: Mallampati scores were collected from 100 surgical patients during both inspiration and expiration and later compared to the score obtained in the medical record, determined by a board certified anesthesiologist. Results: Score deviations from the medical record reference were compared for both inspiration and expiration showing that respiration affects Mallampati scores; for some patients, the scores improved (i.e., decreased), while in others they worsened (i.e., increased). The respiratory change effect was quantified and visualized by plotting the area under the curve of the histogram of the deviations. 42% of the patients had a worsening of scores by 1 or 2 points with inspiration while 36% of the patients had a worsening of scores by 1 or 2 points with expiration. Conclusions: Mallampati scoring is commonly used in evaluating the oropharynx as a part of the airway assessment and as a screening tool for difficult intubations. However, as this study points out, the respiratory cycle substantially affects the Mallampati scoring system, with significant deviations of 1 or 2 points. In a scoring system of 4 score categories, these deviations are remarkable.

Outcomes and Disposition of Patients After Case Cancellation on Day of Surgery for Reasons Attributed to Medical or Anesthetic Care: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many day-of-surgery cancellations are avoidable, and different strategies are used to prevent these costly adverse events. Despite these past analyses and evaluations of positive interventions, studies have not examined the final disposition of patients whose cases were canceled in this late manner. This study sought to determine whether surgical procedures canceled for medical or anesthetic reasons were ultimately rescheduled, and the time elapsed between cancellation and completion. In addition, the resolution of the underlying issue leading to cancellation was examined. METHODS: Two years of surgical case data were reviewed in the electronic health record to isolate all procedures canceled on the intended operative date. These cases were then filtered by the documented reason for cancellation into 2 categories: 1 for cases related to medical or anesthetic care and 1 for unrelated cases. Medical- or anesthetic-related cases were further categorized to better elucidate the underlying reason for cancellation. Cases were then traced to determine if and when the procedure was ultimately completed. If a case was rescheduled, the record was reviewed to determine whether the underlying reason for cancellation was resolved. RESULTS: A total of 4472 cases were canceled in the study period with only 20% associated with medical or anesthetic causes. Of these, 72% were rescheduled and 83% of all rescheduled cases resolved the underlying issue before the rescheduled procedure. Nearly half of all cases (47.8%) canceled on the day of surgery for reasons linked to medical and/or anesthetic care were due to acute conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a fifth of cases that are canceled on the date of surgery are never rescheduled and, if they are rescheduled, the delay can be substantial. Although the majority of patients whose procedure are canceled for reasons related to medical or anesthetic care have resolved the underlying issue that led to initial postponement, a significant portion of patients have no change in their status before the ultimate completion of their surgical procedure.

Objective validation of YouTube™ educational videos for the instruction of regional anesthesia nerve blocks: a novel approach.

BACKGROUND: YouTube™ ("YouTube") is often used as an educational tool to instruct anesthesia providers on regional anesthesia nerve blocks. However, there is no current objective standard to assess the educational quality of these user-uploaded videos. A new approach was used to objectively validate these videos by comparing them to high quality educational sources for the seven most commonly used nerve blocks. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the educational quality of user-uploaded videos when compared to the highest quality anesthesia society websites (NYSORA, ACEP, USRA). METHODS: After reviewing the instructional material available for the seven most frequently conducted nerve blocks on high-quality reference websites, we documented the educational characteristics present including such things as indications, volume, anatomy, etc. Next we reviewed the five most popular videos on YouTube for each block (by views) and documented the presence or absence of these educational characteristics. RESULTS: Eighteen educational characteristics were documented in the "high-quality" anesthesia society reference material. Correlation was sought between this material and YouTube videos. Although there were varying degrees of correlation between the high quality sources and the videos, rarely did YouTube videos contain as high a percentage of these educational characteristics as the well-established sources. Some videos contained very few of these important educational characteristics. CONCLUSION: Although YouTube has been used an educational tool, we recommend that only high quality sources be used to teach or illustrate regional anesthesia nerve blocks.